The fly wants the credit.

Around twenty thousand years ago, sheets of ice thousands of feet thick lay over northern reaches of Europe and Asia, and over all of Canada and New England, spreading as far south as Ohio, the Dakotas, and Washington state. When this ice was at its greatest depth, perhaps a mile in thickness, the water in the oceans worldwide was about 300 feet lower than today.

This is commonly called the ice age, although geologists and climatologists tell us it was part of a much longer period they call a “glacial age,” and they point out that we are technically still in one that began about two and a half million years ago. Those who have watched the “Ice Age” movies, with their woolly mammoths, saber-toothed tigers, and primitive humans, are aware that we actually did have a recent icy period, when those creatures were indeed present, and probably the same people who have seen the movies might also assume that it ended when the ice receded from the United States about 13,000 years ago.

Anthropologists have deduced that about 16,000 years ago, when the sea had dropped between Russia and Alaska leaving a frozen “land bridge,” humans, for the first time, explored their way from Asia into North America. In place of open water there was only permafrost between the two continents in what is now the Bering Strait.

Not the First Ice Age

Scientists generally accept the geological evidence that there have been at least five long glacial ages, each one lasting millions of years. In at least one such period, the glacial age centered around 850 million years ago, the oceans were practically empty and ice covered the earth from both poles almost to the equator. From a quarter million miles in space — the perspective from the moon, for instance — it looked like a snowball earth.

The current glacial age, the one we are still in, began about two and a half million years ago, at the beginning of the Pleistocene epoch. It was during the Pleistocene when modern mammals, especially the larger and smarter ones, began to take over the earth. But the Pleistocene is considered to have ended about 11,000 years ago, and we are now in the Holocene epoch, which is the period of mankind’s rapid development. The current glacial age, you see, has continued into a new epoch.

In a glacial age, such as the present one, the atmosphere worldwide cools by an average of as little as six degrees Celsius, or ten degrees Fahrenheit, and stays cooler. The average temperature of the earth’s surface, that is, the ground temperature, drops too. Precipitation continues year after year, more and more as snow, but cannot melt, and so snow falls onto the previous year’s snow and thickens into ice sheets over parts of several continents. The polar ice spreads, and mountain glaciers grow longer and deeper.


During the warmest periods between one glacial age and the next, there is no lasting ice to speak of around the globe, even at the north and south poles. That is how it was just a few million years before the Pleistocene. Plants grew all over the continent of Antarctica and there was warm open water at the north pole. Since humans did not exist at that point — or if they did, they were not organized into industrial nations — humans did not cause palm trees to grow at the south pole.

A little thing to keep in mind as you look at the earth, by the way: In the southern hemisphere, there is a great land mass at the south pole — the continent Antarctica — and virtually nothing but oceans around it for thousands of miles. In the northern hemisphere it’s just the opposite. There is a great expanse of water at the north pole — a sea — and little else but land around it for thousands of miles.

Even though the ice sheets have melted partway back so they now cover just the polar areas, we are still in a warming phase of the latest glacial age. What determines that the current glacial age has not ended are the remaining Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets and the frozen sea at the north pole. By definition, when this remaining ice has melted, the current glacial age will have ended, and we will anticipate that a sixth great glacial age will begin some millions of years beyond that — we’ll have to wait and see. This complete polar melting will happen, once again, whether mankind exists or not.

Not A Smooth Transition

During a glacial age, though, there are pulses of intense glaciation, and periods of rapid warming which we call interglacials. It is the cooling side of such a glaciation that brought us the most recent “ice age” that peaked 20,000 years ago. For the entire time since then, that is for the past 20,000 years, (which includes the 13,000 years or so since most of the ice receded from the United States), we appear to be on the warming side of an interglacial period which, if it isn’t the end of the glacial age, may last many more thousands of years. This current warming could last until the ice sheets are all melted, but if it doesn’t, and turns abruptly cold again, it could plunge us back into another few thousand years with ice sheets creeping over the continents — but that would still be part of an overall warming trend. Eventually, the glacial age will end and there will likely be no natural ice to be found anywhere on earth.

In other words, it’s kind of like the tides at the seashore. If we compare the incoming tide to the cooling of the earth, and the outgoing tide to the warming of the earth, then we are currently near the end of an outgoing tide. As the tide is changing, you can stand on the beach and the water surges over your feet (temporary cooling), then flows back out (temporary warming), then back over your feet again, and so on. But eventually it no longer reaches your feet, and you are left standing on wet sand. That is sort of where we are now with the current long glacial age and the present interglacial. The most recent ice age that peaked 20,000 years ago was like one of the last surges that covers your feet on the beach. Now we’re at the stage where we would wait to see whether the wet sand dries out completely. Another surge or more may rush all the way up and touch your toes again — another mini-ice age — another interglacial. And then the waves will be gone and there will be a long wait on hot dry sand until the cooling begins once more, like the tide returning to the beach after a few hours, comparable to another — the sixth — glacial age.

Cosmic Forces and Humans

Science has not yet come up with a good explanation of the forces in the universe that have kept this cycle in motion. There are theories and they all involve some very powerful forces, though. And they are comparable with, and probably tied to, other strong forces: the throbbing of pulsars, the bursts of gas emissions from the sun, the elasticity of orbits, and the waves of interstellar energy rays that wash over us like unseen spirits.

Onto this cosmic time scale have arrived modern humans. Over the past hundred years or so, since Albert Einstein shook the earth with his strange theories, we have discovered all this stuff about the glacial ages. We have put a halt to the forest fires that used to burn for years over vast areas of the continents. Thus we may have stalled some of the natural warming. We have begun burning the “fossil fuel” left from decayed and buried forests instead, so maybe it’s a break-even.

Instead of viewing human activity as a cause of global warming, it is valid to look at global warming as a boost to human civilization and a cause, rather than a consequence, of the “industrial revolution.”

Our population is so great, or more precisely, so small, that all the humans on earth, about seven billion people, could just about cover the island of Puerto Rico with 14 square feet per person – about the proximity that people enjoy on a dance floor, or on a crowded sidewalk, or when it’s crowded at the Springfield Fair. If all the people on earth were standing around like a crowd waiting for a speech from a fascinating politician, they could do it on Puerto Rico, and the rest of the earth would be devoid of humans. That’s how much space we actually take up on the earth.

There are those within this jostling crowd who believe that our human activity of the past century or two, and especially since the new millennium began, has substantially affected the ebb and flow of the current glacial age — what is called the earth’s albedo. They want us to believe that the earth is warming because of our reckless activity, especially the burning of fossil fuels, and if we stop burning stuff and stop raising animals that expel methane, we will halt global warming.

Flattering Ourselves

Well, global warming is the nature of the cycle and the cycle of nature. Global warming is absolutely real and would forge ahead even if humans had not invented so much as a campfire. There is evidence that humans have contributed gases to help block the sunlight hitting the earth, and there is even debate whether that contributes to cooling or warming of the atmosphere, but there is no scientific evidence that human activity is affecting the trend of the present interglacial period or the outcome of the current glacial age. There is a difference between our suspicion that we are doing it and scientific evidence that we are doing it. That difference is profound. I am a scientist, so I will refrain from the conceit that I have such cosmic powers until I see the evidence.

I don’t make fun of people who reduce, re-use, and recycle. I am strongly involved in conservation on all levels. Waste and excess are deplorable for so many reasons that I don’t need political persuasion to avoid it and to practice good stewardship of the earth.

Science, in part, is the process of proposing theories, discovering evidence, and assembling information into coherent explanations of the world. Science is also dispassionate. If an explanation does not stand up to proof, it must be discarded, often to the serious disappointment of anyone who wanted to believe the explanation.

If a theory has not been tested, a scientist does not proclaim that the theory is proof. But a few loud scientists who favor a certain political position have been offering theories of human influence as proof of human influence. Having looked at the theories that explain the natural surges in global warming and cooling, for which there is confirming evidence, I must argue that humans are falsely blaming themselves if they believe that they have already made any impact on the forces of the universe. Humans deserve even more to be disregarded who think we can reverse those cosmic forces by changing the U.S. tax code (to punish certain politically uncooperative corporations or industries). They may call themselves scientists, but they are spreading superstition.

And, if we can influence the forces of the universe by political antics — for which we might wait centuries to ascertain the specific results — can we then halt the natural cycle altogether so that the oceans nevermore rise or fall by one meter, the mean temperatures in all zones hold steady, and weather patterns and habitats remain constant?

Such human folly — a sort of incredible arrogance, really — is as if a few of the sand crabs on the beach have suddenly decided that the crabs are collectively responsible for the disappearance of the water and the drying of the sand between tides, and so they force all the crabs to stay buried and completely still, on the premise that their sacrifice will make the water return.

Regarding those who believe humans have caused the earth to warm by roughly one degree in the last hundred years, Æsop may have said it best, around 600 B.C.: The fly sat on the axel-tree of the chariot wheel and said: What a dust I do raise!

=David A. Woodbury=

2 thoughts on “Chariots and Global Warming

  1. Though we seldom listen to indigenous people the Inuits have their theory on Global warming.
    Believing the worlds tilt has change. Scientists of course scoff at this theory.
    An article I read stated the Inuit elders do not speak in anger until they report on scientists harassing polar bears putting collars on them.
    But the Inuits are the people most affected by this change. I copied the following:

    I Still, the Inuit insist they see changes in the sun’s course and the position of the stars in the night sky. “These elders, when they were growing up, they were told to go out every morning, before having anything to eat. They were told to go out at the age of 5 every morning to observe the weather,” Kunuk says. “So when they started talking about the sun and the sunset, I was puzzled too. Everywhere I went, each community, I was getting the same answer: The sun does not settle where it used to. I mean, it [causes]alarm.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.